T H E
F R A N K L Y N R E P O R T
copyright (c) TFR 1995-2001 | REFERENCE: Palestine-Israel Conflict RETURN |
In the statement on Palestine, issued on 9 November, 1938, His
Majesty's Government
announced their intention to invite
representatives
of the Arabs of Palestine, of certain neighboring
countries and of
the Jewish Agency to confer with them in London
regarding future
policy. It was their sincere hope that, as a result
of full, free and
frank discussions, some understanding might be
reached. Conferences
recently took place with Arab and Jewish
delegations, lasting
for a period of several weeks, and served the
purpose of a complete
exchange of views between British Ministers
and the Arab and
Jewish representatives. In the light of the
discussions as well
as of the situation in Palestine and of the
Reports of the Royal
Commission and the Partition Commission,
certain proposals
were formulated by His Majesty's Government
and were laid before
the Arab and Jewish Delegations as the basis
of an agreed settlement.
Neither the Arab nor the Jewish
delegation felt
able to accept these proposals, and the conferences
therefore did not
result in an agreement. Accordingly His Majesty's
Government are free
to formulate their own policy, and after
careful consideration
they have decided to adhere generally to the
proposals which
were finally submitted to and discussed with the
Arab and Jewish
delegations.
The Mandate for Palestine, the terms of which were
confirmed by the
Council of the League of Nations in 1922, has
governed the policy
of successive British Governments for nearly
20 years. It embodies
the Balfour Declaration and imposes on the
Mandatory four main
obligations. These obligations are set out in
Article 2, 6 and
13 of the Mandate. There is no dispute regarding
the interpretation
of one of these obligations, that touching the
protection of and
access to the Holy Places and religious building or
sites. The other
three main obligations are generally as follows:
To place the country under such political, administrative and
economic conditions
as will secure the establishment in Palestine of
a national home
for the Jewish People. To facilitate Jewish
immigration under
suitable conditions, and to encourage, in
cooperation with
the Jewish Agency, close settlement by Jews on
the Land.
To safeguard the civil and religious rights of all inhabitants of
Palestine irrespective
of race and religion, and, whilst facilitating
Jewish immigration
and settlement, to ensure that the rights and
position of other
sections of the population are not prejudiced.
To place the country under such political, administrative and
economic conditions
as will secure the development of self governing
institutions.
The Royal Commission and previous commissions of Enquiry have
drawn attention
to the ambiguity of certain expressions in the
Mandate, such
as the expression `a national home for the Jewish
people', and
they have found in this ambiguity and the resulting
uncertainty as
to the objectives of policy a fundamental cause of
unrest and hostility
between Arabs and Jews. His Majesty's
Government are
convinced that in the interests of the peace and
well being of
the whole people of Palestine a clear definition of
policy and objectives
is essential. The proposal of partition
recommended by
the Royal Commission would have afforded such
clarity, but
the establishment of self supporting independent Arab
and Jewish States
within Palestine has been found to be
impracticable.
It has therefore been necessary for His Majesty's
Government to devise
an alternative policy which will, consistent
with their obligations
to Arabs and Jews, meet the needs of the
situation in Palestine.
Their views and proposals are set forth below
under three heads,
Section I, "The Constitution", Section II.
Immigration and
Section III. Land.
Section I. "The Constitution"
It has been urged that the expression "a national home for the
Jewish people" offered
a prospect that Palestine might in due
course become a
Jewish State or Commonwealth. His Majesty's
Government do
not wish to contest the view, which was expressed
by the Royal
Commission, that the Zionist leaders at the time of the
issue of the
Balfour Declaration recognized that an ultimate Jewish
State was not
precluded by the terms of the Declaration. But, with
the Royal Commission,
His Majesty's Government believe that the
framers of the
Mandate in which the Balfour Declaration was
embodied could
not have intended that Palestine should be
converted into
a Jewish State against the will of the Arab
population of
the country. That Palestine was not to be converted
into a Jewish
State might be held to be implied in the passage from
the Command Paper
of 1922 which reads as follows
"Unauthorized statements have been made to the effect that
the purpose in
view is to create a wholly Jewish Palestine. Phrases
have been used
such as that `Palestine is to become as Jewish as
England is English.'
His Majesty's Government regard any such
expectation as
impracticable and have no such aim in view. Nor have
they at any time
contemplated .... the disappearance or the
subordination
of the Arabic population, language or culture in
Palestine. They
would draw attention to the fact that the terms of
the (Balfour)
Declaration referred to do not contemplate that
Palestine as
a whole should be converted into a Jewish National
Home, but that
such a Home should be founded IN PALESTINE."
But this statement has not removed doubts, and His Majesty's
Government therefore
now declare unequivocally that it is not part
of their policy
that Palestine should become a Jewish State. They
would indeed regard
it as contrary to their obligations to the Arabs
under the Mandate,
as well as to the assurances which have been
given to the Arab
people in the past, that the Arab population of
Palestine should
be made the subjects of a Jewish State against
their will.
The nature of the Jewish National Home in Palestine was
further described
in the Command Paper of 1922 as follows
"During the last two or three generations the Jews have
recreated in Palestine
a community now numbering 80,000, of whom
about one fourth
are farmers or workers upon the land. This
community has its
own political organs; an elected assembly for the
direction of its
domestic concerns; elected councils in the towns;
and an organisation
for the control of its schools. It has its elected
Chief Rabbinate
and Rabbinical Council for the direction of its
religious affairs.
Its business is conducted in Hebrew as a
vernacular language,
and a Hebrew press serves its needs. It has its
distinctive intellectual
life and displays considerable economic
activity. This community,
then, with its town and country population,
its political, religious
and social organisations, its own language, its
own customs, its
own life, has in fact `national' characteristics.
When it is asked
what is meant by the development of the Jewish
National Home
in Palestine, it may be answered that it is not the
imposition of
a Jewish nationality upon the inhabitants of Palestine
as a whole, but
the further development of the existing Jewish
community, with
the assistance of Jews in other parts of the world,
in order that
it may become a centre in which the Jewish people as a
whole may take,
on grounds of religion and race, an interest and
pride. But in order
that this community should have the best
prospect of free
development and provide a full opportunity for the
Jewish people to
display its capacities, it is essential that it should
know that it is
in Palestine as of right and not on sufferance. That is
the reason why it
is necessary that the existence of a Jewish
National Home in
Palestine should be internationally guaranteed, and
that it should be
formally recognized to rest upon ancient historic
connection."
His Majesty's Government adhere to this interpretation of the
(Balfour) Declaration
of 1917 and regard it as an authoritative and
comprehensive description
of the character of the Jewish National
Home in Palestine.
It envisaged the further development of the
existing Jewish
community with the assistance of Jews in other
parts of the world.
Evidence that His Majesty's Government have
been carrying out
their obligation in this respect is to be found in
the facts that,
since the statement of 1922 was published, more
than 300,000 Jews
have immigrated to Palestine, and that the
population of the
National Home has risen to some 450,000, or
approaching a third
of the entire population of the country. Nor has
the Jewish community
failed to take full advantage of the
opportunities given
to it. The growth of the Jewish National Home
and its achievements
in many fields are a remarkable constructive
effort which must
command the admiration of the world and must
be, in particular,
a source of pride to the Jewish people.
In the recent discussions the Arab delegations have repeated
the contention that
Palestine was included within the area in which
Sir Henry McMahon,
on behalf of the British Government, in
October, 1915, undertook
to recognise and support Arab
independence. The
validity of this claim, based on the terms of the
correspondence which
passed between Sir Henry McMahon and the
Sharif of Mecca,
was thoroughly and carefully investigated by the
British and Arab
representatives during the recent conferences in
London. Their report,
which has been published, states that both
the Arab and the
British representatives endeavoured to
understand the point
of view of the other party but that they were
unable to reach
agreement upon an interpretation of the
correspondence.
There is no need to summarize here the arguments
presented by each
side. His Majesty's Government regret the
misunderstandings
which have arisen as regards some of the
phrases used. For
their part they can only adhere, for the reasons
given by their
representatives in the Report, to the view that the
whole of Palestine
west of Jordan was excluded from Sir Henry
McMahon's pledge,
and they therefore cannot agree that the
McMahon correspondence
forms a just basis for the claim that
Palestine should
be converted into an Arab State.
His Majesty's Government are charged as the Mandatory
authority "to secure
the development of self governing institutions"
in Palestine. Apart
from this specific obligation, they would regard
it as contrary to
the whole spirit of the Mandate system that the
population of Palestine
should remain forever under Mandatory
tutelage. It is
proper that the people of the country should as early
as possible enjoy
the rights of self-government which are exercised
by the people of
neighbouring countries. His Majesty's Government
are unable at
present to foresee the exact constitutional forms
which government
in Palestine will eventually take, but their
objective is
self government, and they desire to see established
ultimately an
independent Palestine State. It should be a State in
which the two
peoples in Palestine, Arabs and Jews, share authority
in government
in such a way that the essential interests of each are
shared.
The establishment of an independent State and the complete
relinquishment
of Mandatory control in Palestine would require such
relations between
the Arabs and the Jews as would make good
government possible.
Moreover, the growth of self governing
institutions in
Palestine, as in other countries, must be an
evolutionary process.
A transitional period will be required before
independence is
achieved, throughout which ultimate responsibility
for the Government
of the country will be retained by His
Majesty's Government
as the Mandatory authority, while the people
of the country are
taking an increasing share in the Government,
and understanding
and cooperation amongst them are growing. It
will be the constant
endeavour of His Majesty's Government to
promote good relations
between the Arabs and the Jews.
In the light of these considerations His Majesty's Government
make the following
declaration of their intentions regarding the
future government
of Palestine:
The objective of His Majesty's Government is the
establishment
within 10 years of an independent Palestine State in
such treaty relations
with the United Kingdom as will provide
satisfactorily
for the commercial and strategic requirements of
both countries
in the future. The proposal for the establishment of
the independent
State would involve consultation with the Council of
the League of Nations
with a view to the termination of the
Mandate.
The independent State should be one in which Arabs and Jews
share government
in such a way as to ensure that the essential
interests of
each community are safeguarded.
The establishment of the independent State will be preceded
by a transitional
period throughout which His Majesty's
Government will
retain responsibility for the country. During the
transitional
period the people of Palestine will be given an increasing
part in the government
of their country. Both sections of the
population will
have an opportunity to participate in the machinery of
government, and
the process will be carried on whether or not they
both avail themselves
of it.
As soon as peace and order have been sufficiently restored in
Palestine steps
will be taken to carry out this policy of giving the
people of Palestine
an increasing part in the government of their
country, the objective
being to place Palestinians in charge of all the
Departments of Government,
with the assistance of British advisers
and subject to the
control of the High Commissioner. Arab and
Jewish representatives
will be invited to serve as heads of
Departments approximately
in proportion to their respective
populations. The
number of Palestinians in charge of Departments
will be increased
as circumstances permit until all heads of
Departments are
Palestinians, exercising the administrative and
advisory functions
which are presently performed by British
officials. When
that stage is reached consideration will be given to
the question of
converting the Executive Council into a Council of
Ministers with a
consequential change in the status and functions of
the Palestinian
heads of Departments.
His Majesty's Government make no proposals at this stage
regarding the
establishment of an elective legislature. Nevertheless
they would regard
this as an appropriate constitutional
development,
and, should public opinion in Palestine hereafter show
itself in favour
of such a development, they will be prepared,
provided that
local conditions permit, to establish the necessary
machinery.
At the end of five years from the restoration of peace and
order, an appropriate
body representative of the people of
Palestine and of
His Majesty's Government will be set up to review
the working of the
constitutional arrangements during the
transitional period
and to consider and make recommendations
regarding the constitution
of the independent Palestine State.
His Majesty's Government will require to be satisfied that in
the treaty contemplated
by sub-paragraph (6) adequate provision
has been made for:
the security of, and freedom of access to the Holy Places, and
protection of the
interests and property of the various religious
bodies.
the protection of the different communities in Palestine in
accordance with
the obligations of His Majesty's Government to
both Arabs and Jews
and for the special position in Palestine of the
Jewish National Home.
such requirements to meet the strategic situation as may be
regarded as necessary
by His Majesty's Government in the light of
the circumstances
then existing. His Majesty's Government will also
require to be satisfied
that the interests of certain foreign
countries in Palestine,
for the preservation of which they are at
present responsible,
are adequately safeguarded.
His Majesty's Government will do everything in their power to
create conditions
which will enable the independent Palestine State
to come into being
within 10 years. If, at the end of 10 years, it
appears to His Majesty's
Government that, contrary to their hope,
circumstances require
the postponement of the establishment of
the independent
State, they will consult with representatives of the
people of Palestine,
the Council of the League of Nations and the
neighbouring Arab
States before deciding on such a postponement.
If His Majesty's
Government come to the conclusion that
postponement is
unavoidable, they will invite the co-operation of
these parties in
framing plans for the future with a view to
achieving the desired
objective at the earliest possible date.
During the transitional period steps will be taken to increase
the powers and responsibilities
of municipal corporations and local
councils.
Section II. Immigration
Under Article 6 of the Mandate, the Administration of
Palestine, "while
ensuring that the rights and position of other
sections of the
population are not prejudiced," is required to
"facilitate Jewish
immigration under suitable conditions." Beyond
this, the extent
to which Jewish immigration into Palestine is to be
permitted is
nowhere defined in the Mandate. But in the Command
Paper of 1922 it
was laid down that for the fulfillment of the policy
of establishing
a Jewish National Home:
"it is necessary that the Jewish community in Palestine should
be able to increase
its numbers by immigration. This immigration
cannot be so
great in volume as to exceed whatever may be the
economic capacity
of the country at the time to absorb new arrivals.
It is essential
to ensure that the immigrants should not be a burden
upon the people
of Palestine as a whole, and that they should not
deprive any section
of the present population of their employment."
In practice, from that date onwards until recent times, the
economic absorptive
capacity of the country has been treated as
the sole limiting
factor, and in the letter which Mr. Ramsay
MacDonald, as
Prime Minister, sent to Dr. Weizmann in February
1931 it was laid
down as a matter of policy that economic absorptive
capacity was
the sole criterion. This interpretation has been
supported by resolutions
of the Permanent Mandates Commissioner.
But His Majesty's
Government do not read either the Statement of
Policy of 1922 or
the letter of 1931 as implying that the Mandate
requires them, for
all time and in all circumstances, to facilitate the
immigration of Jews
into Palestine subject only to consideration of
the country's economic
absorptive capacity. Nor do they find
anything in the
Mandate or in subsequent Statements of Policy to
support the view
that the establishment of a Jewish National Home
in Palestine cannot
be effected unless immigration is allowed to
continue indefinitely.
If immigration has an adverse effect on the
economic position
in the country, it should clearly be restricted; and
equally, if it has
a seriously damaging effect on the political position
in the country,
that is a factor that should not be ignored. Although
it is not difficult
to contend that the large number of Jewish
immigrants who
have been admitted so far have been absorbed
economically,
the fear of the Arabs that this influx will continue
indefinitely
until the Jewish population is in a position to dominate
them has produced
consequences which are extremely grave for
Jews and Arabs
alike and for the peace and prosperity of Palestine.
The lamentable
disturbances of the past three years are only the
latest and most
sustained manifestation of this intense Arab
apprehension.
The methods employed by Arab terrorists against
fellow Arabs
and Jews alike must receive unqualified condemnation.
But it cannot
be denied that fear of indefinite Jewish immigration is
widespread amongst
the Arab population and that this fear has
made possible
disturbances which have given a serious setback to
economic progress,
depleted the Palestine exchequer, rendered life
and property
insecure, and produced a bitterness between the Arab
and Jewish populations
which is deplorable between citizens of the
same country.
If in these circumstances immigration is continued up
to the economic
absorptive capacity of the country, regardless of
all other considerations,
a fatal enmity between the two peoples will
be perpetuated,
and the situation in Palestine may become a
permanent source
of friction amongst all peoples in the Near and
Middle East.
His Majesty's Government cannot take the view that
either their obligations
under the Mandate, or considerations of
common sense and
justice, require that they should ignore these
circumstances in
framing immigration policy.
In the view of the Royal Commission the association of the
policy of the Balfour
Declaration with the Mandate system implied
the belief that
Arab hostility to the former would sooner or later
be overcome. It
has been the hope of British Governments ever
since the Balfour
Declaration was issued that in time the Arab
population, recognizing
the advantages to be derived from Jewish
settlement and development
in Palestine, would become reconciled
to the further growth
of the Jewish National Home. This hope has
not been fulfilled.
The alternatives before His Majesty's
Government are either
(i) to seek to expand the Jewish National
Home indefinitely
by immigration, against the strongly expressed
will of the Arab
people of the country; or (ii) to permit further
expansion of the
Jewish National Home by immigration only if the
Arabs are prepared
to acquiesce in it. The former policy means rule
by force. Apart
from other considerations, such a policy seems to
His Majesty's Government
to be contrary to the whole spirit of
Article 22 of the
Covenant of the League of Nations, as well as
to their specific
obligations to the Arabs in the Palestine Mandate.
Moreover, the relations
between the Arabs and the Jews in
Palestine must
be based sooner or later on mutual tolerance and
goodwill; the
peace, security and progress of the Jewish National
Home itself requires
this. Therefore His Majesty's Government,
after earnest consideration,
and taking into account the extent to
which the growth
of the Jewish National Home has been facilitated
over the last twenty
years, have decided that the time has come to
adopt in principle
the second of the alternatives referred to above.
It has been urged that all further Jewish immigration into
Palestine should
be stopped forthwith. His Majesty's Government
cannot accept
such a proposal. It would damage the whole of the
financial and
economic system of Palestine and thus effect
adversely the
interests of Arabs and Jews alike. Moreover, in the
view of His Majesty's
Government, abruptly to stop further
immigration would
be unjust to the Jewish National Home. But,
above all, His
Majesty's Government are conscious of the present
unhappy plight
of large numbers of Jews who seek refuge from
certain European
countries, and they believe that Palestine can and
should make a
further contribution to the solution of this pressing
world problem.
In all these circumstances, they believe that they
will be acting consistently
with their Mandatory obligations to both
Arabs and Jews,
and in the manner best calculated to serve the
interests of the
whole people of Palestine, by adopting the following
proposals regarding
immigration:
Jewish immigration during the next five years will be at a rate
which, if economic
absorptive capacity permits, will bring the Jewish
population up to
approximately one third of the total population of
the country. Taking
into account the expected natural increase of
the Arab and Jewish
populations, and the number of illegal Jewish
immigrants now in
the country, this would allow of the admission, as
from the beginning
of April this year, of some 75,000 immigrants
over the next five
years. These immigrants would, subject to the
criterion of economic
absorptive capacity, be admitted as follows:
For each of the next five years a quota of 10,000 Jewish
immigrants will
be allowed on the understanding that a shortage one
year may be added
to the quotas for subsequent years, within the
five year period,
if economic absorptive capacity permits.
In addition, as a contribution towards the solution of the
Jewish refugee problem,
25,000 refugees will be admitted as soon
as the High Commissioner
is satisfied that adequate provision for
their maintenance
is ensured, special consideration being given to
refugee children
and dependents.
The existing machinery for ascertaining economic absorptive
capacity will be
retained, and the High Commissioner will have the
ultimate responsibility
for deciding the limits of economic capacity.
Before each periodic
decision is taken, Jewish and Arab
representatives
will be consulted.
After the period of five years, no further Jewish immigration
will be permitted
unless the Arabs of Palestine are prepared to
acquiesce in
it.
His Majesty's Government are determined to check illegal
immigration, and
further preventive measures are being adopted.
The numbers of any
Jewish illegal immigrants who, despite these
measures, may succeed
in coming into the country and cannot be
deported will be
deducted from the yearly quotas.
His Majesty's Government are satisfied that, when the
immigration over
five years which is now contemplated has taken
place, they will
not be justified in facilitating, nor will they be under
any obligation to
facilitate, the further development of the Jewish
National Home by
immigration regardless of the wishes of the Arab
population.
Section III. Land
The Administration of Palestine is required, under Article 6 of
the Mandate, "while
ensuring that the rights and position of other
sections of the
population are not prejudiced," to encourage "close
settlement by Jews
on the land," and no restriction has been
imposed hitherto
on the transfer of land from Arabs to Jews. The
Reports of several
expert Commissions have indicated that, owing to
the natural growth
of the Arab population and the steady sale in
recent years of
Arab land to Jews, there is now in certain areas no
room for further
transfers of Arab land, whilst in some other areas
such transfers of
land must be restricted if Arab cultivators are to
maintain their existing
standard of life and a considerable landless
Arab population
is not soon to be created. In these circumstances,
the High Commissioner
will be given general powers to prohibit and
regulate transfers
of land. These powers will date from the
publication of
this statement of policy and the High Commissioner
will retain them
throughout the transitional period.
The policy of the Government will be directed towards the
development of the
land and the improvement, where possible, of
methods of cultivation.
In the light of such development it will be
open to the High
Commissioner, should he be satisfied that the
"rights and position"
of the Arab population will be duly preserved,
to review and modify
any orders passed relating to the prohibition
or restriction of
the transfer of land.
In framing these proposals His Majesty's Government have
sincerely endeavoured
to act in strict accordance with their
obligations under
the Mandate to both the Arabs and the Jews. The
vagueness of the
phrases employed in some instances to describe
these obligations
has led to controversy and has made the task of
interpretation difficult.
His Majesty's Government cannot hope to
satisfy the partisans
of one party or the other in such controversy
as the Mandate has
aroused. Their purpose is to be just as between
the two people in
Palestine whose destinies in that country have
been affected by
the great events of recent years, and who, since
they live side by
side, must learn to practice mutual tolerance,
goodwill and co
operation. In looking to the future, His Majesty's
Government are
not blind to the fact that some events of the past
make the task
of creating these relations difficult; but they are
encouraged by
the knowledge that as many times and in many places
in Palestine
during recent years the Arab and Jewish inhabitants
have lived in
friendship together. Each community has much to
contribute to
the welfare of their common land, and each must
earnestly desire
peace in which to assist in increasing the well being
of the whole
people of the country. The responsibility which falls on
them, no less
than upon His Majesty's Government, to co operate
together to ensure
peace is all the more solemn because their
country is revered
by many millions of Moslems, Jews and
Christians throughout
the world who pray for peace in Palestine and
for the happiness
of her people.
COMMENT:
This document reveals Great Britain's more realistic understanding of its role as the Mandate country. It also strains to convince itself that things will get better between the Jews and the Palestinians. At the time of this document, Zionist-Jews were operating in a terrorist mode and both adversaries knew that they would not ever agree on the growing presence of Jews. Unfortunately, no one expected Palestinians and their Arab brothers to ever match the strength of the Zionists who by the time of this document were being supported by Jewish money from the USA. It was at this time, that Israel was developing stronger ties to the U.S. because current British administrations were tiring of the Mandate responsibility, both costs and frustration due to Jews challenging the British Military assigned to keep the peace. At this point in Time, Britain began looking for a way out of the Mandate! It had a new preoccupation to worry with: Hitler and the coming of the Second World War!
cqh